Judges' Ratio Decidendi in Hate Speech Crime Decisions: A Study of Decision Number 255/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Jkt.Utr from an Islamic Criminal Law Perspective
Ratio Decidendi Hakim dalam Putusan Tindak Pidana Ujaran Kebencian: Kajian Putusan Nomor 255/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Jkt.Utr Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15642/aj.2026.12.1.20-48Keywords:
hate speech; Islamic criminal law; maqasid al-shariah; social media; ta'zir.Abstract
The development of social media has increased the ease of disseminating information while simultaneously giving rise to criminal acts of hate speech that have the potential to disrupt social order. One application is reflected in the North Jakarta District Court Decision Number 255/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Jkt.Utr which imposed a criminal sentence on the perpetrator of spreading provocative narratives through a WhatsApp group. This study aims to analyze the judge's legal considerations in the decision and examine them from the perspective of Islamic criminal law. The study employs a normative juridical method, utilizing a statutory, conceptual, and comparative approach. The results show that the judge's considerations focused on fulfilling the elements of Article 28 paragraph (2) in conjunction with Article 45A paragraph (2) of the ITE Law. From the perspective of Islamic criminal law, this act is considered a jarimah ta'zīr because it contains elements that spread hostility, threatening public order and human honor. This criminalization is in line with the objectives of maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah, especially in maintaining social welfare, honor, and stability.Downloads
References
Amrani, Hanafi. Politik Pembaruan Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2019.
Andriani, Astri D., Susanti Ainul Fitri, dan Khoiruddin Muchtar. “Model Komunikasi Literasi Digital dalam Mengatasi Ujaran Kebencian di Media Sosial.” Interaksi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi 13, no. 2 (2024): 439–440.
ARTICLE 19. Penjelasan “Ujaran Kebencian” yang Harus Dilarang. London: ARTICLE 19, 2019.
ARTICLE 19. Prohibiting Incitement to Discrimination, Hostility or Violence. London: ARTICLE 19, 2012.
Asri, Rahman. “Ekspresi Kebebasan Berpendapat di Media Sosial: Telaah Kritis Ruang Publik Habermas.” Dalam Digitalisasi dan Humanisme dalam Ekonomi Kreatif, 303–306. 2020.
Atikah, dan A. Fadhlan. “Hate Speech in Social Media from Islamic Ethical Perspective.” Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 59, no. 2 (2021): 377–402.
Aziz, Usman. Konsep Hifẓ al-Lisān dalam Kitab Tanbīh al-Ghāfilīn dan Hate Speech dalam Pasal 28 UU ITE 2024 sebagai Upaya Mengatasi Ujaran Kebencian di Media Sosial. Skripsi, UIN Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, 2024.
Bagenda, Christina, Abdul Kholiq, Pratiwi Ayu Sri D., Sri Setiawati, dan Budi Handayani. “Social Media Ethics from The View of Maqasid Al-Shariah: Modern Ijtihad to Prevent Hoaxes and Hate Speech.” Ratio Legis Journal 4, no. 4 (2025): 2985–2992.
Bawono, Bambang Tri, Moh. Nurul Huda, Ahmad Hadi Prayitno, dan Moh. Aris Siswanto. “Human Trafficking and the Relevance of Hifz al-Nafs and Hifz al-’Ird in Contemporary Islamic Legal Ethics.” MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review 4, no. 1 (2025): 597–598.
Casarosa, Federica. Freedom of Expression and Countering Hate Speech. Florence: European University Institute, 2021.
Citra, Anisyah, dkk. “Analisis Penegakan Hukum terhadap Kasus Ujaran Kebencian di Media Sosial Berdasarkan Hukum Positif di Indonesia.” VISA: Journal of Vision and Ideas 3, no. 3 (2023): 1092–1102. https://doi.org/10.47467/visa.v3i3.5710.
Columbia Global Freedom of Expression. Factsheet on Chilling Effect on Freedom of Expression: Regional Human Rights Courts’ Perspective. New York: Columbia University, 2025.
European Court of Human Rights. Guide on Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights: Freedom of Expression. Strasbourg: Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights, 2026.
Guillén-Nieto, Victoria. Hate Speech: Linguistic Perspectives. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 2023.
Horan, Rachel, dan Jolana Makraiová. Understanding Hate Speech Within the Context of International Criminal Law: Final Report. Nuremberg: International Nuremberg Principles Academy, 2024.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang No. 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.
Irfan, M. Nurul, dan Masyrofah. Fiqih Jinayah. Jakarta: Amzah, 2013.
Irwanti, Marlinda, Andrés Alexis Ramírez-Coronel, Tribhuwan Kumar, Iskandar Muda, Forqan Ali Hussein Al-Khafaji, Huda Takleef AlSalami, dan Aalaa Yaseen Hassan. “The Study of Freedom of Expression in Islamic Teachings with an Emphasis on Nahj al-Balagha.” HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 79, no. 1 (2023): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v79i1.8368.
Jalaludin Rifa’i, Iman, dkk. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Serang: Sada Kurnia Pustaka, 2023.
Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia. Siaran Pers No. 143/HM/KOMINFO/04/2021. 26 April 2021.
Lestari, Wilda. “Ta’zir Crimes in Islamic Criminal Law: Definition, Legal Basis, Types and Punishments.” Al-Qanun: Jurnal Kajian Sosial dan Hukum Islam 5, no. 1 (2024): 22–32.
Likumahwa, Fanuela Astrid Magnolia. “Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Ujaran Kebencian melalui Media Sosial di Wilayah Hukum Polda Maluku (Studi Putusan No. 319/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Amb).” 2021.
Marsaid. Al-Fiqh Al-Jinayah (Hukum Pidana Islam): Memahami Tindak Pidana dalam Hukum Islam. Palembang: Noer Fikri, 2020.
Naro, Wahyuddin, Abdul Syatar, Muhammad Majdy Amiruddin, Islamul Haq, Achmad Abubakar, dan Chaerul Risal. “Shariah Assessment Toward the Prosecution of Cybercrime in Indonesia.” International Journal of Criminology and Sociology 9 (2020): 572–586.
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Rabat Plan of Action on the Prohibition of Advocacy of National, Racial or Religious Hatred That Constitutes Incitement to Discrimination, Hostility or Violence. Geneva: OHCHR, 2012.
Prasja, Teguh Rama. Modul Ajar Hukum ITT. PDF. LMSSPADA Kemdiktisaintek.
Rahmi HS, Maisyarah. Maqasid Syariah Sertifikasi Halal. Palembang: Bening Media Publishing, 2021.
Reza, Muhammad Dzaky. “Prohibition of Hate Speech in the Qur’an and Its Relationship with Religious Moderation.” Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur’an dan Tafsir 7, no. 1 (2022): 157–163.
Roisah, Kholis, dan Mochamad Arif Budiman. “Ethics of Social Media from Maqashid Syari’ah Perspective.” Proceeding of NURAICON (2022): 1–4.
Royani, Yayan Muhammad. “Kajian Hukum Islam terhadap Ujaran Kebencian/Hate Speech dan Batasan Kebebasan Berekspresi.” Jurnal Iqtisad: Reconstruction of Justice and Welfare for Indonesia 5, no. 2 (2018): 20.
Schauer, Frederick. Free Speech: A Philosophical Enquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Shamsuddin, Mustafa Mat Jubri. “Islamic Rulings and Guidelines for Social Media Influencers: Maqasid Shariah Point of View.” Sains Insani 9, no. 2 (2024): 1–2.
Sinurat, Aksi. Azas-Azas Hukum Pidana Materil di Indonesia. Kupang: Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Nusa Cendana, 2023.
Solikin, Nur. Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Pasuruan: CV Penerbit Qiara Media, 2021.
Wahyuni, Fitri. Hukum Pidana Islam: Aktualisasi Nilai-Nilai Hukum Pidana Islam dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Tangerang Selatan: PT Nusantara Persada Utama, 2018.
Wati, Emy Rosna, dan Abdul Fatah. Buku Ajar Hukum Pidana. Sidoarjo: UMSIDA Press, 2020.
Wirogioto, Ali Johardi, dan R. Jossy S. Belgradoputra. Memahami Hukum Siber. Bekasi: CV Intelektual Writer, 2025.
“Hoaks di WhatsApp.” Dalam Ragam Nuansa Literasi Media, 78–79. 2023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Allian Sadira, Syahrul Anwar, Enceng Arif Faizal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.









